Skip to main content

4 Types of Criticism and How to Handle Them


If you are human, you will be on the receiving end of criticism. Criticism can be helpful, especially if it provides you feedback for improvement whereas at other times it is tantamount to bullying. Therefore, criticism needs to be handled depending on its type (Lazarus & Lazarus, 2000).

1. Irrelevant criticism: This kind of criticism comes from an individual who is critical of everyone or everything to the extent that they would make critical comments about something that is totally out of context and not relevant to the situation. For example, you are talking to your neighbor about an upcoming vacation you are planning and in the midst of your conversation, your neighbor states “….by the way you appear to be gaining weight.” Irrelevant criticism doesn’t deserve your response and is best ignored. Say, “OK, I appreciate you letting me know” and shift back to the conversation on hand.

2. Vague criticism: In this type of criticism, you are not sure if the person criticizing you is trying to help you with a valid feedback for improvement or is putting you down. Use probing questions starting with what, where, when, how and, why to explore the person’s intent behind the criticism before you become defensive. For example, if someone important to you says, “Lately, you have been slacking off,” then ask them, “What do you mean by slacking off?” or “When have you seen that behavior in me?” 

3. Valid criticism: Also called constructive criticism, this is when people offer you helpful suggestions for improvement based on accurate perception of events. The intent of the person giving this criticism is to help you. Usually, a criticism is valid if you have heard it from a person who is rational and balanced in their thinking and emotions, is knowledgeable about the subject they are giving feedback on, and also if you have heard it from more than one person. You respond to a valid criticism by one of the following four ways: acknowledging, thanking, apologizing, and disarming, i.e., agreeing to what appears accurate to you in the criticism. An example of a valid criticism is when your supervisor points out to you that you have been forgetting to copy them on certain kinds of emails.

4. Unjustified criticism: This type of criticism is not based on any facts and the intent of the person giving this criticism is to put you down, attack your character, or manipulate you into saying or doing things to meet their needs.  For example, “You are an idiot,” “You are stupid,” or “By doing this, you have proven again on how incompetent you are.” Your first response shouldn’t be to retort back defensively, but to take a step back, focus on your breathing for a few seconds, slow down your thinking, and try to visualize yourself in a rational frame of mind. Having done that, the best way to respond to an unjustified criticism is to use assertive communication skills, without attacking or surrendering. You can ask more probing questions similar to those used for vague criticism or you may come up with a rational response such as, “Like every human being, I do sometimes make mistakes, but that doesn’t make me a stupid or incompetent person.” Sometimes simply walking away after saying, “Hey, do you know the difference between constructive and destructive criticism?” gives the person criticizing you the message that the problem is theirs and not yours. If the unjustified criticism amounts to bullying, then spot the behavior and tell the person to stop in a clear and calm voice and seek help from either a professional or your human resources department. You can find more resources on bullying on the American Psychological Association website (www.apa.org/topics/bullying/).

To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that are proven to work for depression, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page.

HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA

REFERENCES

Lazarus, A.A., & Lazarus, C.N. (2000). The 60-second shrink: 101 strategies for staying sane in a crazy world. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Value-Based Goals: The Antidote for “Success Depression”

A disconnect between your present accomplishments and your core values may make you suffer from success depression  wherein despite “having it all” (e.g., successful career, stable relationships, healthy children, etc.), you still struggle with depression and view your accomplishments as hollow (Zettle, 2007). The cure for this malaise is to clarify your core values and have goals and actions that are driven by these values. Psychotherapist Russ Harris describes values as our heart’s deepest desires for the way we want to interact with the world, other people, and ourselves. They are what we want to stand for in life, how we want to behave, what sort of person we want to be, and what sort of strengths and qualities we want to develop (Harris, 2009). Values are subjective; what one may consider as a value (e.g., being famous) may be considered as being cocky by another person. Moreover, values do change with time. For instance, you may value social popularity and raising a fa...
Post a Comment
Read more

The 6 Facets of Impostor Syndrome and its Relation to Depression

A lot has been written recently about impostor syndrome, also called impostor phenomenon in scientific literature. Most pop psychology descriptions of this condition, which impairs professional performance and leads to burnout, skew towards making this a syndrome of perceived fraudulence or fear of being seen as fake. However, the fact is that people with impostor syndrome describe a myriad of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors and none of the existing scales capture all the facets of this complex and multifaceted syndrome (Mark et al., 2019). Also, contrary to popular belief, impostor syndrome is not limited to highly successful individuals and depends more on how people respond to specific achievement tasks when there is an element of being appraised.  The six facets that define this phenomenon are discussed below: (Bravata et al., 2019; Clance & Imes, 1978; Walker & Saklofske, 2023). 1. Fake: This attribute is the closest to the original conceptualization of imposto...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rumination: A Maladpative Coping Style that Fosters Depression

Rumination is a maladaptive style of responding to stressful situations in which a person repetitively and passively focuses on the symptoms of distress and the possible causes and consequences of these symptoms. Ruminators mistakenly believe that by focusing on their past feelings, they can somehow have a better understanding of their emotions and this will help them solve their problems. The opposite is true: rumination makes people more fixated on their problems and feelings without leading to any active problem-solving to change the circumstances around these symptoms. Research shows that women are more likely to engage in rumination compared to men, which also makes them more prone for depression (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008). Rumination fosters inactivity and can come in the way of getting things done. Many people confuse rumination with worry, but these two entities differ in the following ways (Lyubomirsky et al., 2015): Rumination is focused on the past while worry is fo...
Post a Comment
Read more