Skip to main content

The 3Ps of Pessimistic Explanatory Style in Depression


When faced with an adversity, people with depression default to a pessimistic explanatory style (Sweeney et al., 1986). This rigid style has three facets, also called the 3Ps (Reivich & Shatté, 2002; Seligman, 2006):

1. “Personal” thinking wherein a person finds a cause within themselves to explain an adverse situation. For example, if your boss didn’t respond back to your “Hi,” you assume that they are not happy with you.

2. “Permanent” thinking wherein a person facing a bad outcome believes that the situation is a never ending ordeal rather than temporary. For example, you have a disagreement with your coworker and your knee jerk reaction is, “She is always doing this to me.”

3. “Pervasive” thinking in which a person thinks that a particular problem will affect many areas of their life rather than having a circumscribed effect. For instance, you fail to meet a deadline at work and feel that you have never been an organized person your entire life.

People with pessimistic explanatory styles, when faced with a failure, tend to slip into a state of learned helplessness, which is a harbinger of depression (Seligman, 2006). Learned helplessness is the state of mind when an individual expects that they have no response in their repertoire to change the likelihood of an adverse outcome. A person with depression attributes a sense of personal helplessness to a failure (e.g., I am stupid versus the exam was tough). Research has supported the association of pessimistic explanatory style with depression and also change in explanatory style leading to improvement in depressive symptoms (Raps et al., 1982; Seligman et al., 1988). Learning to recognize your pessimistic explanatory style helps you “think outside the box” for alternative explanations for adversities and avoiding learned helplessness. It provides you with a more accurate view of the situation and helps you problem-solve more creatively rather than being stuck in a negative explanatory loop.

As an exercise to help you change your explanatory style, identify three recent adverse situations related to different spheres of your life (work, relationships, personal life, etc.) and try to ascertain if your explanatory style consists of one or more of the 3 Ps of the pessimistic explanatory style. If you discover that your explanatory style is mostly pessimistic, then for future stressful situations, complete these three statements to help you shake off this unhelpful explanatory style (Reivich & Shatté, 2002):

1. “A more accurate way of seeing this is …”
2. “That’s not true because …”
3. “A more likely outcome is … and I can (what you can do) to deal with it.”

To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that are proven to work for depression, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page. 

HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA

REFERENCES

Raps, C. S., Peterson, C., Reinhard, K. E., Abramson, L. Y., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). 
Attributional style among depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 102-108. 

Reivich, K., & Shatté, A. (2002). The resilience factor. New York, NY: Broadway Books. 

Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Learned optimism. New York, NY: Vintage Books. 

Seligman, M. E. P., Castellon, C., Cacciola, J., Schulman, P., Luborsky, L., Ollove, M., & Downing, R. (1988). Explanatory style change during cognitive therapy for unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 13-18. 

Sweeney, P. D., Anderson, K., & Bailey, S. (1986). Attributional style in depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 974-991.







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Value-Based Goals: The Antidote for “Success Depression”

A disconnect between your present accomplishments and your core values may make you suffer from success depression  wherein despite “having it all” (e.g., successful career, stable relationships, healthy children, etc.), you still struggle with depression and view your accomplishments as hollow (Zettle, 2007). The cure for this malaise is to clarify your core values and have goals and actions that are driven by these values. Psychotherapist Russ Harris describes values as our heart’s deepest desires for the way we want to interact with the world, other people, and ourselves. They are what we want to stand for in life, how we want to behave, what sort of person we want to be, and what sort of strengths and qualities we want to develop (Harris, 2009). Values are subjective; what one may consider as a value (e.g., being famous) may be considered as being cocky by another person. Moreover, values do change with time. For instance, you may value social popularity and raising a fa...
Post a Comment
Read more

10 Poor Listening Styles to Avoid

When we talk about communication, we mostly focus on speaking, writing, and reading. Listening is seldom emphasized as a primary form of communication, even though listening enables us to satisfy an individual’s deep psychological needs – to be understood, to be affirmed, to be validated, and to be appreciated (Covey, 2020). We mostly listen not to understand but to prepare response, judge, or interpret information through our own motives and frame of reference. These poor listening styles can be subsumed under these 10 categories (Covey 2014, Harvard Business Review Press, 2019): 1. Spacing out or ignoring is when you zone out because you are too preoccupied with your own thoughts. This does happen to all of us, but you don’t want to be labelled as a spacey person if this keeps happening to you.  2. Pretend or removed listening is where you may be multitasking and give the speaker the impression that you are paying attention using fillers like “yeah,” uh-huh,” “right,” “cool” or...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are You Suffering from Loneliness?

What is loneliness? Loneliness is a fundamental aspect of life; at some point, everyone will experience it to varying degrees. Even though it is recognized as a public health concern (Office of the Surgeon General, 2023), there is still a need for more discussion about what the experience of loneliness entails and how to recognize it in oneself or others. For starters, loneliness is the distressing feeling you experience when there is a discrepancy between the interpersonal relationships you wish to have and those you currently have (Peplau & Perlman, 1982). It is not the number or frequency of social contacts but your subjective appraisal of the quality of relationships and the satisfaction with the relationships that influences loneliness (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006). Moreover, loneliness is not synonymous with social isolation, nor is it an inevitable consequence of being alone. You can be in the company of others and still experience loneliness, whereas you may not feel...
Post a Comment
Read more