Skip to main content

The 3Ps of Pessimistic Explanatory Style in Depression


When faced with an adversity, people with depression default to a pessimistic explanatory style (Sweeney et al., 1986). This rigid style has three facets, also called the 3Ps (Reivich & Shatté, 2002; Seligman, 2006):

1. “Personal” thinking wherein a person finds a cause within themselves to explain an adverse situation. For instance, if your boss doesn’t respond to your “Hi,” you might assume they're unhappy with you.

2. “Permanent” thinking wherein a person facing a bad outcome believes that the situation is a never-ending ordeal rather than temporary. For example, you have a disagreement with your coworker and your knee-jerk reaction is, “She is always doing this to me.”

3. “Pervasive” thinking in which a person thinks that a particular problem will affect many areas of their life rather than having a circumscribed effect. For instance, you fail to meet a deadline at work and feel that you have never been an organized person your entire life.

People with pessimistic explanatory styles, when faced with a failure, tend to slip into a state of learned helplessness, which is a harbinger of depression (Seligman, 2006). Learned helplessness is the state of mind when an individual expects that they have no response in their repertoire to change the likelihood of an adverse outcome. A person with depression attributes a sense of personal helplessness to a failure (e.g., I am stupid versus the exam was tough). Research has supported the association of pessimistic explanatory style with depression and also change in explanatory style leading to improvement in depressive symptoms (Raps et al., 1982; Seligman et al., 1988). Learning to recognize your pessimistic explanatory style helps you “think outside the box” for alternative explanations for adversities and avoid learned helplessness. It provides you with a more accurate view of the situation and helps you problem-solve more creatively rather than being stuck in a negative explanatory loop.

As an exercise to help you change your explanatory style, identify three recent adverse situations related to different spheres of your life (work, relationships, personal life, etc.) and try to ascertain if your explanatory style consists of one or more of the 3 Ps of the pessimistic explanatory style. If you discover that your explanatory style is pessimistic mainly, then for future stressful situations, complete these three statements to help you shake off this unhelpful explanatory style (Reivich & Shatté, 2002):

1. “A more accurate way of seeing this is …”
2. “That’s not true because …”
3. “A more likely outcome is … and I can (what you can do) to deal with it.”

To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that are proven to work for depression, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page. 

HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA

REFERENCES

Raps, C. S., Peterson, C., Reinhard, K. E., Abramson, L. Y., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). 
Attributional style among depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 102-108. 

Reivich, K., & Shatté, A. (2002). The resilience factor. New York, NY: Broadway Books. 

Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Learned optimism. New York, NY: Vintage Books. 

Seligman, M. E. P., Castellon, C., Cacciola, J., Schulman, P., Luborsky, L., Ollove, M., & Downing, R. (1988). Explanatory style change during cognitive therapy for unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 13-18. 

Sweeney, P. D., Anderson, K., & Bailey, S. (1986). Attributional style in depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 974-991.







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Questions That Will Help You Overcome Anxiety, Fear and Panic

Anxiety, fear, and panic are associated with irrational thoughts involving themes of threat or danger. These irrational thoughts take the form of “if” or “what if” beliefs. For example, a person who is afraid of heights may think, “If I am on the elevator alone and it gets stuck, no one will be able to save me,” or a person with panic disorder may believe, “If my heart beats too fast, it means that I am probably having a heart attack.” The “if” and “what if” thinking in anxiety disorders is a byproduct of your irrational thought patterns, including magnification, catastrophizing, overgeneralizing, and “should” and “must statements.” Sometimes, anxiety is a result of genuine problems or situations that have no solutions. How does one then decide to challenge one's irrational thinking or problem-solve, or try acceptance strategies? The seven questions that will help you guide your decision to choose one path over another to overcome anxiety are as follows:  What is the likelihoo...
2 comments
Read more

Situational Analysis: An Effective Tool to Address Maladaptive Social Patterns in Chronic Depression

Approximately 30% of individuals with depressed mood develop a chronic course as defined by the criteria for persistent depressive disorder (PDD) (Struck et al., 2021). Research shows that depressed individuals have difficulties in handling another person's negative state or suffering, getting overwhelmed in emotionally tense situations, a condition called empathic distress. This leads to an avoidant interpersonal style due to fear of interaction with others, which in turn deprives these individuals of positive interpersonal experiences, thus perpetuating depressive symptoms (Struck et al., 2021). Situational analysis is a technique used in the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). CBASP is one of the few psychotherapies effective for chronic depression and PDD (Wiersma et al., 2014; Wiersma et al., 2021). CBASP combines behavioral and cognitive strategies with a problem-solving focus and emphasizes interpersonal issues. Its primary goals are to help indivi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Does it Really Mean to be Resilient?

What Constitutes Resilience? When adversity strikes, we are reminded to be "resilient." But what does it really mean to be resilient? For starters, resilience is not a single entity but a broad array of abilities for constructively and positively adapting to risk, adversity, or some monumental negative event (Dunn et al., 2009). Implicit within this definition are the two critical components of resilience – experiencing an adversity and a positive adaptation to it. Positive adaption has variously been defined, and the general consensus is that it connotes not only an absence or low levels of psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety or depression) but also competence to meet societal and cultural expectations (Masten, 2001). The good news is that resilience is not a personality attribute that is fixed but is a dynamic process that individuals can develop (Luthar et al., 2000). In other words, no one is “born” or “naturally” resilient; it is something you learn and develop o...
Post a Comment
Read more