Skip to main content

3 Ways to Handle Conflicts in a Relationship



Conflicts and arguments are an inevitable part of any relationship. However, there are strategies that will help you either avoid conflicts or handle them more constructively. The article discusses three such techniques. 

1. Don’t do the “ABCDE” behaviors during communication

The acronym “ABCDE” refers to certain types of communication behaviors that increase conflict in a relationship and include the following (Duggal, 2016):

Accusation: Accusations usually are “You always …” or “You never…” statements. Accusations may have some kernel of truth in them, but that gets exaggerated and dramatized by the heat of the argument. Accusations lead to counteraccusations and defensiveness, and take the focus away from one’s own shortcomings and from resolving the conflict at hand.

Blame: Individuals may blame their partner’s actions for a problem or blame their mental illness, moral weakness, or personal inadequacies for the problems the couple is facing. For example, “If you had taken those medications, then we would have been able to go on this trip.”

Coercion: People use coercion to force their partners to do what they want by making demands, threats, nagging, criticizing, complaining, and inducing guilt. The partner on the receiving end gives in to the coercion because they want peace, which reinforces the coercive partner's behavior. However, over time, the receiving partner may become accustomed to this coercion and ignore the coercive partner's demands, which may lead the latter to escalate their coercive tactics, eventually resulting in more discord.

Defensiveness: Defensiveness is the usual reaction of a partner on the receiving end of an accusation or blame, but it only adds to the argument and conflict. Defensiveness really amounts to saying, “The problem isn’t me, it’s you.”

Excessive reassurance seeking: Excessive reassurance seeking is repeatedly requesting reassurance from your partner that you are lovable and worthy. Examples include, “Do you still love me?” or “Am I a good person?” or “Are you going to stay with me?” Excessive reassurance-seeking wears your partner down, and they start to feel burdened, frustrated, and helpless, and their reassurances become tinged with irritation.

2. Use the “STOP” and “START” techniques to handle arguments 

These techniques help you deal with your emotions and response in the heat of an argument (Christensen et al., 2014):

STOP technique: STOP is a technique used in mindfulness training and stands for:
S: Stop what you are doing.
T: Take a deep breath.
O: Observe the interaction between you and your partner.
P: Proceed differently with the interaction. For example, recognize and avoid the “ABCDE” behaviors described previously. On the contrary, label the pattern of behavior with statements such as, “Here we go with our usual dance,” or “I think we are getting into it again.” 

START technique: The acronym START stands for:
S: Stop what you are doing.
T: Take a deep breath.
A: Attend to the emotions inside you.
R: Reveal your emotional state to your partner. For example, “I am starting to feel upset about this situation.” Even if you can’t pinpoint the exact emotion or what triggered it, it is OK to express it with a statement such as, “I am beginning to feel tense but don’t know why.”
T: Take an interest in what is going on emotionally with your partner. This can be accomplished either by gently asking your partner what they are experiencing at the moment or by reflecting on their feelings if you are aware of their emotional state. Be cautious with the second approach because it can backfire if you mislabel your partner’s emotion.

When you are emotionally charged during an argument, your impaired judgment precludes you from gauging your own or your partner’s emotions. STOP and START techniques provide you with an option in these situations to step back from the heat of the conversation, interrupt your dysfunctional interaction, and try a more constructive approach.

3. Know the difference between a complaint and a criticism

When you want to express disagreement or dissatisfaction with your partner, you can either complain or criticize. If you know the difference between these two approaches, it is a no-brainer that complaining is preferable. A complaint focuses on a specific behavior or event and has three components (Gottman & Silver, 2015):
  • How do you feel? (e.g., “I am really upset.”)
  • The specific situation you have feelings about. (e.g., “You didn’t do the dishes last night.”)
  • What do you now need/want/prefer? (e.g., “I want you to do the dishes now.”)
Criticism, in contrast, is a global expression of negative feelings or judgments about the other’s character or personality. For example, “What is wrong with you? How can you be so forgetful? You just don’t care.” Criticisms often contain phrases such as “you always” or “you never.” Not uncommonly, one may start with a complaint that then morphs into a criticism as the discussion gets more heated. An example below clarifies the difference between a complaint and a criticism.

Complaint: The dishes are still in the sink. I am upset that you didn’t take care of it like you said you would. Could you please deal with it now?

Criticism: Why can’t you ever remember anything? You can’t do the only chore you are expected to do. You are so careless.

Recognizing this difference will help you nip the negativity of criticism in the bud before it starts to affect your relationship.

To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that are proven to work for depression, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page.

HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA

REFERENCES

Christensen, A., Doss, B. D., & Jacobson, N. S. (2014). Reconcilable differences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Duggal, H.S. (2016). The Complete Guide to Self-Management of Depression. Bloomington, IN: Archway Publishing.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York, NY: Harmony Books.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

7 Questions That Will Help You Overcome Anxiety, Fear and Panic

Anxiety, fear, and panic are associated with irrational thoughts involving themes of threat or danger. These irrational thoughts take the form of “if” or “what if” beliefs. For example, a person who is afraid of heights may think, “If I am on the elevator alone and it gets stuck, no one will be able to save me,” or a person with panic disorder may believe, “If my heart beats too fast, it means that I am probably having a heart attack.” The “if” and “what if” thinking in anxiety disorders is a byproduct of your irrational thought patterns, including magnification, catastrophizing, overgeneralizing, and “should” and “must statements.” Sometimes, anxiety is a result of genuine problems or situations that have no solutions. How does one then decide to challenge one's irrational thinking or problem-solve, or try acceptance strategies? The seven questions that will help you guide your decision to choose one path over another to overcome anxiety are as follows:  What is the likelihoo...

Situational Analysis: An Effective Tool to Address Maladaptive Social Patterns in Chronic Depression

Approximately 30% of individuals with depressed mood develop a chronic course as defined by the criteria for persistent depressive disorder (PDD) (Struck et al., 2021). Research shows that depressed individuals have difficulties in handling another person's negative state or suffering, getting overwhelmed in emotionally tense situations, a condition called empathic distress. This leads to an avoidant interpersonal style due to fear of interaction with others, which in turn deprives these individuals of positive interpersonal experiences, thus perpetuating depressive symptoms (Struck et al., 2021). Situational analysis is a technique used in the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). CBASP is one of the few psychotherapies effective for chronic depression and PDD (Wiersma et al., 2014; Wiersma et al., 2021). CBASP combines behavioral and cognitive strategies with a problem-solving focus and emphasizes interpersonal issues. Its primary goals are to help indivi...

What Does it Really Mean to be Resilient?

What Constitutes Resilience? When adversity strikes, we are reminded to be "resilient." But what does it really mean to be resilient? For starters, resilience is not a single entity but a broad array of abilities for constructively and positively adapting to risk, adversity, or some monumental negative event (Dunn et al., 2009). Implicit within this definition are the two critical components of resilience – experiencing an adversity and a positive adaptation to it. Positive adaption has variously been defined, and the general consensus is that it connotes not only an absence or low levels of psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety or depression) but also competence to meet societal and cultural expectations (Masten, 2001). The good news is that resilience is not a personality attribute that is fixed but is a dynamic process that individuals can develop (Luthar et al., 2000). In other words, no one is “born” or “naturally” resilient; it is something you learn and develop o...