Skip to main content

Measurement-Based Care in Depression


What is Measurement-based Care?

Measurement-based care is extensively used in medical conditions and involves matching treatment interventions with the outcomes for those treatments. For example, a provider would periodically measure fasting blood glucose or glycosylated hemoglobin in an individual with diabetes to make adjustments to the treatment plan, including medication and lifestyle changes. Measurement-based care fosters self-management by making the individual aware if they are on the right treatment plan or if they need to modify it in collaboration with their provider. While measurement-based care has been proven to improve outcomes for medical conditions, mental health, unfortunately, has lagged behind in adopting it as a regular practice.

Measurement-based care in depression is an algorithmic application of published, accepted, clinical guidelines and consists of four steps (Morris et al., 2012):

Step 1: Screening: Your provider may use one of the several available tools to screen for the presence and the severity of depressive symptoms. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is the most commonly used tool in primary care settings to screen depression. It is a self-reporting scale that has nine items which parallel the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder with a total score ranging from 0-27 (Kroenke al., 2001). A cut-off score of 10 or higher on PHQ-9 correctly identifies major depressive disorder in 88% of individuals and rules it out in 85% of individuals being screened for this condition (Levis et al., 2019).

Step 2: Treatment selection: Following your diagnosis with depression, your provider will discuss a range of available options, including medications and/or psychotherapy. If an antidepressant is chosen, your provider and you will jointly decide on what antidepressant would work best for you after considering the following:
  • Your current symptoms.
  • Your past history with antidepressants.
  • The anticipated effectiveness of the antidepressant in your case.
  • Tolerability – the degree to which you can tolerate adverse effects of the antidepressant.
  • Safety – the risk in terms of clinical adverse events that you are exposed to due to the antidepressant as assessed by physical examination or laboratory testing.
  • Affordability.
Step 3: Monitoring outcomes and adjusting medication: This is the heart of measurement-based care and involves measuring the severity of depressive symptoms using tools such as the PHQ-9, safety and tolerability of the medications (frequency, intensity, and burden of side effects), and adherence with the medications.

Measurement-based care helps a provider determine if an individual with depression has received an adequate antidepressant trial or not. If an individual has had 26-49% reduction in their depressive symptoms, then their response to the antidepressant is considered a partial response. The next logical step guided by measurement-based care is to assess for tolerability and safety. If there are no issues with these, then the dose of the antidepressant should be increased roughly every 2 weeks until a minimum therapeutic dose has been reached or until one achieves remission (Morris et al., 2012). Other strategies such as augmentation with other non-antidepressant medications or complementing with psychotherapy may be also tried in partial response. Similarly, a non-response (less than or equal to 25% reduction in symptoms) would trigger a change in medication after an adequate trial with an antidepressant. 

Step 4: Long-term monitoring and maintenance: Here the goal of treatment is remission and return to previous functioning levels. Two questions that are addressed in this step are:
  • What to do if the antidepressant stops working?
  • When should the antidepressant be stopped after a period of sustained remission?
While advocating for yourself, insist that your provider follow a paradigm of measurement-based care for treating your depression. A study showed that compared to individuals receiving standard care, those receiving measurement-based care are more likely to achieve greater response and remission rates (Guo et al., 2015). This study also found that individuals receiving standard care were on lower dosage of antidepressants compared to individuals receiving measurement-based care. Thus, measurement-based care ensures that you are receiving an antidepressant at an adequate dose and are not stuck at a low sub-therapeutic dose. It also ensures that you are tolerating the antidepressant well without any safety issues, that you are adhering with the treatment regimen, and that the treatment regimen is changed if the response is inadequate. The period between 1 and 3 months after starting an antidepressant may be most critical for fine-tuning the antidepressants, which may yield faster and better outcome (Guo et al., 2015).
 

Monitor Your Depression Using the “5 Rs”

Once diagnosed with depression, you can track the course of your depression using the “5 Rs,” which are defined as below (Frank et al., 1991; Riso et al., 1997). Here again, PHQ-9 has been proven to be a reliable measure for gauging response to depression treatment (Löwe et al., 2004).

Response: Response is defined as a significant level of improvement in depression following a treatment. This improvement is big enough to separate an individual who is a responder from a non-responder. The concept of response is applied to first 4-8 weeks of starting a new treatment for depression. Typically, in studies of depression, response denotes a 50% reduction in depression scores in one of the rating scales for depression. For example, if your initial score on PHQ-9 was 22 and it dropped to 11 after six weeks of starting an intervention, then you will be considered as having a positive response to treatment.

Remission: Remission is defined as clinical improvement, which is greater than response with few signs of depression still remaining and a lower likelihood of subsequent exacerbations. Remission can be partial if an individual still has more than minimal symptoms of depression, but not enough to meet the clinical criteria for depression. On the other hand, in full remission, an individual has no more than minimal symptoms of depression. For example, if your score on the PHQ-9 drops to less than 5 and is sustained at that level for at least a few weeks, then your depression is in full remission.

Relapse: Relapse is defined as re-emergence of depressive symptoms after response to treatment, but before reaching recovery. For example, if your PHQ-9 score initially decreased from 16 to 4 after starting a treatment, but again rose to 10 and stayed the same for at least two weeks, then your depression has relapsed.

Recovery: Recovery means achieving full remission for at least six months. In terms of self-assessment, it would be having a score below 5 on the PHQ-9 for at least 6 months. But recovery is more than just a number. It signifies an individual’s return to their previous healthy level of functioning accompanied with a general sense of well-being. People in recovery may not be entirely free from depressive symptoms. They may still have good and bad days, but their sense of optimism and hope helps them have a sustained recovery, especially if they are using the tools to self-manage depression.

Recurrence: Recurrence is return of depressive symptoms, which meet criteria for a new episode of depression after at least six months of recovery. A score higher of 10 or higher on the PHQ-9 signals a recurrence.

The 5Rs have long been used in clinical research in depression, but seldom used as a self-management tool by people with depression. Knowing these definitions empowers you to track the course of your depression by using the self-assessment tools such as the PHQ-9 as described above. It also prepares you to have a meaningful dialogue with your healthcare provider, which ensures that you get optimal and effective treatment. The gold standard for treating depression doesn’t stop at response, but is full remission leading to recovery. Failure to achieve full remission is associated with higher risk of relapse of depressive symptoms, increased functional impairment, and a greater burden of other medical and psychiatric conditions (McIntyre & O’Donovan, 2004). Make full remission leading to recovery your goal in your journey of overcoming depression.

To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that are proven to work for depression, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page.

HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA

REFERENCES

Frank, E., Prien, R. F., Jarrett, R. B., Keller, M. B., Kupfer, D. J., Lavori, P. W., Rush, A. J., & Weissman, M. M. (1991). Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions for terms in major depressive disorder: remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 851-855.

Guo, T., Xiang, Y. T., Xiao, L., Hu, C. Q., Chiu, H. F. K., Ungvari, G. S., Correll, C. U., Lai, K. Y. C., Feng, L., Geng, Y., Feng, Y., & Wang, G. (2015). Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: a randomized controlled trial with blind raters. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(10), 1004-1013.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606-613.

Levis, B., Benedetti, A, & Thombs, B. D. (2019). Accuracy of patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: Individual participant data meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 365:l1476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1476.

Löwe, B, Unüzer, J., Callahan, C. M., Perkins, A. J., & Kroenke, K. (2004). Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Medical Care, 42(12), 1194-1201.

Morris, D. W., Toups, M., & Trivedi, M. H. (2012). Measurement-based care in the treatment of clinical depression. FOCUS, X(4), 428-433.

McIntyre, R. S., & O’Donovan, C. (2004). The human cost of not achieving full remission in depression. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(3 Suppl 1), 10S-16S.

Riso, L. P., Thase, M. E., Howland, R. H., Friedman, E. S., Simons, A. D., & Tu, X. M. (1997). A prospective test of criteria for response, remission, relapse, recovery, and recurrence in depressed patients treated with cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 43, 131-142.

Comments

  1. Dr Duggal, first of all I have been enjoying the posts, first time reading the blog as the subject is dear to what we are building. I think there are opportunities to really use measurements and quantify / model approaches to anxiety, stress and depression and would like to dig in more.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 Poor Listening Styles to Avoid

When we talk about communication, we mostly focus on speaking, writing, and reading. Listening is seldom emphasized as a primary form of communication, even though listening enables us to satisfy an individual’s deep psychological needs – to be understood, to be affirmed, to be validated, and to be appreciated (Covey, 2020). We mostly listen not to understand but to prepare response, judge, or interpret information through our own motives and frame of reference. These poor listening styles can be subsumed under these 10 categories (Covey 2014, Harvard Business Review Press, 2019): 1. Spacing out or ignoring is when you zone out because you are too preoccupied with your own thoughts. This does happen to all of us, but you don’t want to be labelled as a spacey person if this keeps happening to you.  2. Pretend or removed listening is where you may be multitasking and give the speaker the impression that you are paying attention using fillers like “yeah,” uh-huh,” “right,” “cool” or...

The 6 Facets of Impostor Syndrome and its Relation to Depression

A lot has been written recently about impostor syndrome, also called impostor phenomenon in scientific literature. Most pop psychology descriptions of this condition, which impairs professional performance and leads to burnout, skew towards making this a syndrome of perceived fraudulence or fear of being seen as fake. However, the fact is that people with impostor syndrome describe a myriad of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors and none of the existing scales capture all the facets of this complex and multifaceted syndrome (Mark et al., 2019). Also, contrary to popular belief, impostor syndrome is not limited to highly successful individuals and depends more on how people respond to specific achievement tasks when there is an element of being appraised.  The six facets that define this phenomenon are discussed below: (Bravata et al., 2019; Clance & Imes, 1978; Walker & Saklofske, 2023). 1. Fake: This attribute is the closest to the original conceptualization of imposto...

Value-Based Goals: The Antidote for “Success Depression”

A disconnect between your present accomplishments and your core values may make you suffer from success depression  wherein despite “having it all” (e.g., successful career, stable relationships, healthy children, etc.), you still struggle with depression and view your accomplishments as hollow (Zettle, 2007). The cure for this malaise is to clarify your core values and have goals and actions that are driven by these values. Psychotherapist Russ Harris describes values as our heart’s deepest desires for the way we want to interact with the world, other people, and ourselves. They are what we want to stand for in life, how we want to behave, what sort of person we want to be, and what sort of strengths and qualities we want to develop (Harris, 2009). Values are subjective; what one may consider as a value (e.g., being famous) may be considered as being cocky by another person. Moreover, values do change with time. For instance, you may value social popularity and raising a fa...