In today’s fast-moving global economy, the concept of one-size-fits-all linear career path is a thing of the past. Employees have unique needs in context of their work. Some view it to as a means to an end, some as a steppingstone for advancement in their career while others may consider it a calling. These three types of orientations toward work are described in more detail below (Wrzesniewski et al., 1997):
1. Job orientation: Individuals with a job orientation are only interested in the material benefits from work and do not seek or receive any other type of reward from it. Their main source of joy is outside their work and work is a means to provide resources to enjoy their time outside of work. They often wish time would pass more quickly at work and greatly anticipate weekends and vacations.
2. Career orientation: Individuals with a career orientation have a deeper personal investment in their work. They strive to move upward in their career, to receive better pay or higher titles, and to achieve more power and a better social standing that comes with this advancement. They sometimes feel that their work may be a waste of time but know that they must do sufficiently well in their current role to grow.
3. Calling orientation: Individuals with a calling orientation do not work solely for monetary gain or career advancement (though these are not excluded) but for the fulfillment that their work brings them. They describe their work as an integral part of themselves and their identity. They are intrinsically motivated by their work.
These orientations are not mutually exclusive, and one can have a calling orientation and still desire a good pay and title. Research shows that people with a calling orientation report a higher level of job satisfaction (Wrzesniewski et al., 1997). While all this is great in theory and appeals to our common sense, but when it comes to job satisfaction, you are best served when you align your meaning of work with your true orientation. Knowing about these work orientations also helps you understand why your colleagues may have a different way of looking at work, especially if you are in a supervisory role. Finally, if you are trying to find a new job in your field of work or transitioning to a new role at the same job or looking to change your vocation, then having a good grip on your work orientation will ensure that you will pick something that is most satisfying to you.
There is no hard and fast algorithm on who would lean towards what type of work orientation. Just because having a calling orientation has a feel-good quality, it doesn’t mean that one must always strive for such an orientation. In fact, research shows that people who are passionate about their job, a quintessential attribute of the calling orientation, are more likely to be exploited at work (Kim et al., 2020). Of course, this is not to say that you become less passionate about what you do. However, if you are one of those people who always volunteers to do the extra work that no one else is willing to do because it is your “calling,” beware that you may be signing up for more burnout!
To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that promote mental health and well-being, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page.
Kim, J. Y., Campbell, T. H., Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2020). Understanding contemporary forms of exploitation: Attributions of passion serve to legitimize the poor treatment of workers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 121-148.
To learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that promote mental health and well-being, check out Dr. Duggal's Author Page.
HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA
REFERENCES
Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: people’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21-33.Kim, J. Y., Campbell, T. H., Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2020). Understanding contemporary forms of exploitation: Attributions of passion serve to legitimize the poor treatment of workers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 121-148.
Comments
Post a Comment