Skip to main content

Acceptance and Change: The Two Pillars for Keeping Relationships Intact



Though sounding simple, learning to accept and change are powerful strategies that keep relationships intact. “Accepting” your partner means that you are tolerating your partner’s unpleasant or offensive behavior while at the same time trying to understand the deeper meaning of that behavior and putting it in the larger context of your relationship with your partner (Christensen et al., 2014). For example, an individual may become more accepting of their partner’s introverted nature or tendency to criticize. Do not confuse acceptance with submission. Submission is enduring offensive behavior from a position of weakness as one has no alternative. In contrast, acceptance is tolerating offensive behavior from a position of strength as you choose to do so while seeing the offensive behavior in the larger context of your relationship with your partner. Acceptance also doesn’t mean one cannot assertively differ from one's partner, resist one's aversive behavior, or try to limit it.

“Change,” on the other hand, occurs when the perpetrator of the unpleasant behavior does the unpleasant behavior less frequently or with less intensity. For example, a person who criticizes their partner may decrease the frequency or intensity of their criticism. Change can happen spontaneously when you feel an inner desire to do things differently, or it can occur deliberately when you change in response to your partner's demands. Spontaneous change is more gratifying as it comes with fewer emotional strings.

One-sided acceptance or change may lead to resolving relationship conflicts, but the best solution to most problems involves acceptance by one partner and change by the other. For example, one partner becomes more accepting of the other partner’s criticism because they feel that the intention of the criticizing partner is not to deliberately put them down but to guide them, and, unfortunately, this is their way of doing it. The criticizing partner changes the way they express displeasure toward the receiving partner by avoiding hurtful labels (e.g., “you are an idiot”) or by refraining from bringing up past issues (e.g., “you never …” or “you always…”). You may ask, “Between acceptance and change, what should happen first?” Andrew Christensen and colleagues recommend that acceptance is the best place to start, as acceptance makes you less defensive, helps you understand your partner better, is not driven by pressure and coercion, and is more likely to foster a spontaneous change in your partner (Christensen et al., 2014). However, you should never accept certain things, including the following three circumstances:
1. Violence, destruction, and physical coercion
2. Psychological, emotional, and verbal abuse
3. Infidelity

Below are some questions that will help you facilitate change in your partner and yourself:
  • “What changes would I like from my partner?”
  • “Can I put these changes in a more specific request that focuses on positive actions rather than stopping negative actions?”
  • If my request to change does not make a difference, then
        “Am I requesting my partner to change their core personality?”
        “Am I invoking emotional vulnerabilities by requesting change?”
        “Am I justifying the request to change as an urgent need?”
        “Am I justifying the request to change by comparing to others?"
        “Am I justifying the request to change by appealing to fairness or love?”
  • “What specific and simple changes could I make for my partner that my partner would like me to?”
  • “What actions of mine may get in the way of change rather than facilitating change?”
Check out Dr. Duggal’s Author Page to learn more about evidence-based self-management techniques that promote mental health and well-being.

HARPREET S. DUGGAL, MD, FAPA

REFERENCES

Christensen, A., Doss, B. D., & Jacobson, N. S. (2014). Reconcilable differences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

7 Questions That Will Help You Overcome Anxiety, Fear and Panic

Anxiety, fear, and panic are associated with irrational thoughts involving themes of threat or danger. These irrational thoughts take the form of “if” or “what if” beliefs. For example, a person who is afraid of heights may think, “If I am on the elevator alone and it gets stuck, no one will be able to save me,” or a person with panic disorder may believe, “If my heart beats too fast, it means that I am probably having a heart attack.” The “if” and “what if” thinking in anxiety disorders is a byproduct of your irrational thought patterns, including magnification, catastrophizing, overgeneralizing, and “should” and “must statements.” Sometimes, anxiety is a result of genuine problems or situations that have no solutions. How does one then decide to challenge one's irrational thinking or problem-solve, or try acceptance strategies? The seven questions that will help you guide your decision to choose one path over another to overcome anxiety are as follows:  What is the likelihoo...

Situational Analysis: An Effective Tool to Address Maladaptive Social Patterns in Chronic Depression

Approximately 30% of individuals with depressed mood develop a chronic course as defined by the criteria for persistent depressive disorder (PDD) (Struck et al., 2021). Research shows that depressed individuals have difficulties in handling another person's negative state or suffering, getting overwhelmed in emotionally tense situations, a condition called empathic distress. This leads to an avoidant interpersonal style due to fear of interaction with others, which in turn deprives these individuals of positive interpersonal experiences, thus perpetuating depressive symptoms (Struck et al., 2021). Situational analysis is a technique used in the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). CBASP is one of the few psychotherapies effective for chronic depression and PDD (Wiersma et al., 2014; Wiersma et al., 2021). CBASP combines behavioral and cognitive strategies with a problem-solving focus and emphasizes interpersonal issues. Its primary goals are to help indivi...

What Does it Really Mean to be Resilient?

What Constitutes Resilience? When adversity strikes, we are reminded to be "resilient." But what does it really mean to be resilient? For starters, resilience is not a single entity but a broad array of abilities for constructively and positively adapting to risk, adversity, or some monumental negative event (Dunn et al., 2009). Implicit within this definition are the two critical components of resilience – experiencing an adversity and a positive adaptation to it. Positive adaption has variously been defined, and the general consensus is that it connotes not only an absence or low levels of psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety or depression) but also competence to meet societal and cultural expectations (Masten, 2001). The good news is that resilience is not a personality attribute that is fixed but is a dynamic process that individuals can develop (Luthar et al., 2000). In other words, no one is “born” or “naturally” resilient; it is something you learn and develop o...